Stonewall Estates v. CF&I STEEL CORP.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Groves
The water court 1 set aside a prior judgment and decree awarding absolute and conditional rights to non-tributary underground water for the reason that it lacked jurisdiction. The determination of lack of jurisdiction was based upon the fact that the notice given by resume was defective in that it failed to specify that the water involved was claimed to be non-tributary. We affirm.
The appellant Stonewall Estates is the successor in interest to John W. Mecom, who was the original applicant for the subject water rights. Stonewall Estates and Mecom are referred to here as the applicant. On April…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. ColdrenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Safranek v. Town of LimonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- In Re Water Rights of Fort Lyon Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- West End Irrigation Co. v. GarveySupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- Matter of Application for Water Rights of PreisserSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
3Cited by19 opinions
- City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Closed Basin Landowners Ass'n v. Rio Grande Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- United States v. City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- State v. Southwestern Colorado Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- United States v. BellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.