Legal Opinion
Paupst v. Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 21, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JIULIANTE, Senior Judge.
William J. Paupst (Paupst) petitions for review from the January 18, 2001 order of the Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement Board (Board) that denied his application for service-connected disability benefits. We are asked to consider whether Paupst, a participating member of the Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement System (PMRS), is entitled to receive disability pension benefits where he is permanently disabled from performing his duties as a police officer but is otherwise capable of gainful employment. We affirm.1
*1068Plumstead Township (Township) is a second class township…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- LaBelle v. State Employees Retirement SystemAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Celi v. Trustees of Pipefitters Local 537 Pension PlanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
- Crawford v. Borough of LewisburgCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Johnson v. Public Employees Retirement Board of the Public Employees Retirement Ass'nNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Arbitration Between Ridley Park Police & Borough of Ridley ParkCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- W.J. Perroz v. Fox Chapel BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- J.C. Gondek v. PA Municipal Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017