Legal Opinion

Donithan v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided November 3, 2023No. 2:21-cv-01136Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Patricia Donithan, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:21-cv-1136 vV. Judge Michael H. Watson Ohio Department of Rehabilitation Magistrate Judge Vascura & Correction, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (“Defendant”) moves for summary judgment on each of Patricia Donithan’s (“Plaintiff”) claims of retaliation under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”). Mot., ECF Nos. 59, 61.’ For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant's motion. I. FACTS Plaintiff worked for Defendant from 1996…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API