Legal Opinion
Intermountain Ford Tractor Sales Co. v. Massey-Ferguson Ltd.
District Court, D. Utah
Decided November 9, 1962No. C 160-61PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.
The plaintiffs are retail farm equipment dealers doing business in Idaho and Utah.
The defendant Massey-Ferguson Inc. is a Maryland corporation qualified to do business in most states of the United States, including Utah. It manufactures and distributes farm and industrial equipment and operates certain company stores in Utah and Idaho which are involved in plaintiffs’ claim. Massey-Ferguson Finance Corporation, a Maryland corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Massey-Ferguson Inc. The home offices of both Massey-Ferguson Inc. and Massey-Ferguson Finance…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. Scophony Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Piedmont Label Company v. Sun Garden Packing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Ruby Velandra and Roy Velandra v. Regie Nationale Des Usines Renault and Renault, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Hoffman Motors Corporation v. Alfa Romeo SpADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- California Clippers, Inc. v. United States Soccer Football Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.