Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert A. Holman, Also Known as Birna Shaw
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 8, 1999No. 98-3872PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
Robert A. Holman appeals his conviction in the district court 1 for being a felon in possession of a firearm transported in interstate commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e)(1). He contends the district court erred in denying his motions for judgment of acquittal and, citing United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626 (1995), he also argues Congress lacked authority under the Commerce Clause to enact section 922(g). We affirm.
We first conclude the district court did not err in denying Holman’s motions for a judgment of acquittal because the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Reed Raymond PriorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Phillip Wilson BatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Willie Christopher JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Aaron SheltonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Robert L. ShepherdCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Robert Joseph MorinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Yulunda K. SloanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Harry Lee BarberCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Harry Lee BarberCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.