Legal Opinion

Northeast Construction Group, Inc. v. Deconstruction, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 31, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), entered March 4, 2004, after a nonjury trial, awarding plaintiff the principal sum of $50,308, plus interest, costs and disbursements, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant contractor failed to establish its counterclaims, which asserted a right to deduct amounts spent to remedy certain alleged defaults by plaintiff subcontractor under the subcontract. Paragraph 3.4.1 of the subcontract required giving notice as a condition precedent to taking such deductions (see generally Oppenheimer & Co. v Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon &…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer & Co. v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. 153 Hudson Development, LLC v. DiNunnoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tishman Westwide Construction LLC v. ASF Glass, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Mike Building & Contracting, Inc. v. Just Homes, LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2010
  3. East Empire Constr. Inc. v. Borough Constr. Group LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  4. East Empire Constr. Inc. v. Borough Constr. Group LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  5. Zeus Constr. Servs., LLC v. Fame Constr., Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API