United States v. Dave Chinazor Chigbo
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
Appellant was convicted of importation of heroin and possession of heroin with intent to distribute, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 952(a), and 960(a)(1), (b). Appellant appeals his conviction on the ground that the district court issued an improperly coercive modified Allen charge after polling some members of the jury. Appellant appeals his sentence on the ground that he did not receive a downward departure for diminished capacity. We AFFIRM.
I
Appellant argues that the district court’s Allen charge coerced the jury. 1 After trial and deliberation, the jury…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. William ReyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. James Norton, United States of America v. Paul Fosco, James Pinckard, Paul A. Di Franco, James Norton, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Oneida Indian Nation of Wisconsin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. Raul Trujillo, Francisco Nelson FuentesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Frank Dickerson, A.K.A. Lane, A.K.A. Frank DixonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. WoodardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. TobinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.