Legal Opinion

Omaha & Grant Smelting & Refining Co. v. Rucker

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1895Published

JError to the District Court of Arapahoe County. ON REHEARING.

1Opinion of the CourtReed, P. J.

On the former hearing of this case judgment of the district court was reversed. On reargument it is found that the court was misled, and the former decision not warranted. The *335former finding of the court must be set aside and the judgment of the district court affirmed.

Plaintiff brought suit against Stanley G. Wight, Rucker, the defendant, and others to recover money paid by the plaintiff for ores bought as alleged from the defendant, the title to such ores was found to be in other parties and plaintiff was compelled and did pay for the ore to the owner; See, O. & G. S. & R. Co. v. Tabor et…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Winship v. the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  2. Leggett v. . HydeNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Omaha & Grant Smelting & Refining Co. v. TaborSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  4. Dwinel v. StoneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1849
  5. Salter v. . HamNew York Court of Appeals · 1865

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API