Smith v. Zimbalist
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
From the “findings of fact” made pursuant to the trial of the action, it appears that plaintiff, who was of the age of eighty-six years, although not a dealer in violins, had been a collector of rare violins for many years; “that defendant was a violinist of great prominence, internationally known, and himself the owner and collector of rare and old violins made by the old masters”; that at the suggestion of a third person, and without the knowledge by plaintiff of defendant’s intention in the matter, defendant visited plaintiff at the home of the latter and there asked plaintiff if he might…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- White v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Sherwood v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Hawkins v. . PembertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Conner v. HendersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1818
- Dounce v. . DowNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Beachcomber Coins, Inc. v. BoskettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- Mosher v. Mayacamas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- City of Torrance v. CastnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Bentley v. SlavikDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.