Rutherford v. Kelly
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES RUTHERFORD, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00293-L-BGS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 13 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 14 LAWRENCE W. KELLY, et al., [ECF No. 8] 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Defendant Michael K. Murphy’s (“Murphy”) motion 18 to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint under Rule 12(b)(1) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil 19 Procedure. Plaintiff opposed the motion and Defendants replied. The Court decides the 20 matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L. R.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.