Legal Opinion

Grey v. Milliken & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 7, 2000No. A00A1000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Presiding Judge.

Donovan Grey appeals from the grant of summary judgment to Milliken & Company on his claim for failure to provide a safe workplace 1 after he was injured while working at a construction site owned by Milliken. Milliken contended it was entitled to summary judgment on Grey’s claim because it had relinquished control of the property to the independent contractor, Fluor Daniel, during the period of construction and, therefore, it was Fluor Daniel’s responsibility to provide Grey with a safe working environment. 2 We agree and affirm.

This case arose when another Fluor…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Supchak v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Englehart v. Oki America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. Kraft General Foods, Inc. v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Braswell v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ramcke v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Saunders v. INDUSTRIAL METALS AND SURPLUS, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Greenwald v. KershCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. Dalton v. 933 Peachtree, L.P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API