Legal Opinion

Litman v. Litman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1984PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative for the reasons stated in the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division (93 AD2d 695). We cannot say that the expert opinion with respect to the economic value of the plaintiff’s law practice would not be of assistance in fashioning a distributive award under the statute.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Litman v. LitmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. McSparron v. McSparronNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Burns v. BurnsNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Marcus v. MarcusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Granade-Bastuck v. BastuckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API