Legal Opinion

Chorney v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 2, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRathbun, J.

This is an action in assumpsit to recover the proceeds of a policy of life insurance issued by defendant on the life of plaintiff’s intestate, Mary Chorney. At the conclusion of the testimony at the trial in the Superior Court the trial justice ruled that, as certain conditions of the contract of insurance had been violated, the plaintiff could recover only the amount of the premiums paid and directed the jury to return a verdict as follows: “By direction of the Court the jury find that the defendant did not promise in manner and form as the plaintiff hath in his declaration thereof…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barker v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Gallant v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  3. Murphy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Sulski v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915
  5. Montgomery v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Briggs v. United Services Life Insurance CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Langan v. United States Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  3. American National Insurance v. HerreraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Mahn v. American Life & Accident Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Eklund v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API