Stacy v. Stephen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county against William Stephen, doing business as Central Mercantile Company, defendant, and W. D. Underhill, garnishee, to recover $247.54 for goods sold and delivered. From an order, Cant, J., denying a motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint • making the garnishee a party, plaintiffs appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
On August 30, 1898, the Central Mercantile Company, engaged in the commission business at Duluth as a corporation, made an assignment, under the insolvent laws of the state, for the equal benefit of all its creditors, to W. D. Underhill, garnishee and respondent in this cause. Due notice of the assignment was given to plaintiffs, who were creditors of the insolvent concern, and they duly appeared in the proceedings, and presented and. filed their claim, together with a release thereof, executed in due form of law. On December 9, 1898, subsequent to the assignment and to the filing of such…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Griffin v. JorgensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Weller v. HammerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barrett v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Hupfer v. National Distilling Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- State ex rel. Working v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1915
- Laplante v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Buckheim v. BuckheimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.