Legal Opinion

In Re Folding Carton Antitrust Litigation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 24, 1988No. MDL-250PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILL, District Judge.

This multi-district case arose out of massive criminal and civil antitrust litigation involving a nationwide price-fixing conspiracy among manufacturers of folding cartons in violation of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. In September 1979, the parties and the court approved what was then the largest antitrust class action settlement in history. The case is currently before us on two motions of the United States: a motion to intervene pursuant to Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and a motion to vacate a second settlement agreement entered…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. White v. MurthaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. 17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 528, 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7813 Eddie Stallworth v. Monsanto Company v. J. W. Palmer, Movants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. Culbreath v. DukakisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Houck ex rel. United States v. Folding Carton Administration CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. In Re HouckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API