Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Rosenfeld

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 13, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

S. Samuel Di Falco, S.

The petitioner seeks the payment of a legacy bequeathed to her under the will of her father. Letters testamentary were issued October 19,1961, more than two years ago. The executors oppose payment of the legacy because of a pending negligence action commenced against the decedent prior to his death and a possible liability of the estate in this connection. The executors contend that the entire estate must be held as a reserve for this contingent liability (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 208-b, formerly § 207). In Matter of Schwartz (19 Misc 2d 203, 204), the court held: “ An…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of SegallNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. In re the Estate of BaldwinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  3. In re the Accounting of SchwartzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re BielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. In re the Estate of VasquezNew York Surrogate's Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API