Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

BRADY v. SIDAMON-ERISTOFF

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 1, 2024No. 1:21-cv-07895Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CARLIA BRADY, Case No. 21–07895–ESK–MJS Plaintiff, v. OPINION ANDREW SIDAMON-ERISTOFF, et al., Defendants. KIEL, U.S.D.J. THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendants Andrew Sidamon- Eristoff, Robert Romano, Ford Scudder, and Elizabeth Maher Muoio’s motion to dismiss (Motion) the second amended complaint (ECF No. 36 (Second Am. Compl.)) of plaintiff Carlia Brady (ECF No. 40). Plaintiff filed an opposition (ECF No. 46 (Pl.’s Opp’n Br.)) to which defendants replied (ECF No. 50 (Defs.’ Reply Br.)).1 This matter was reassigned to me after…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API