Legal Opinion

State v. Glenn

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 17, 1999No. A99A0145PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Eldridge, Judge.

A Mitchell County trial court granted Antonio Glenn’s motion to compel the State to reveal the identity of its confidential informant (“CI”). The trial court did so solely on the basis that the CI “was paid compensation by the law enforcement agents for the furnishing of information” and, hence, was “an agent of law enforcement.” The trial court certified such ruling for immediate review. See, e.g., Bolt v. State, 230 Ga. App. 760 (497 SE2d 406) (1998). We granted interlocutory appeal in order to address the issue of whether compensation given to a Cl waives the State’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Thornton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. Beck v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Henderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Glenn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API