Legal Opinion

Textile Workers Union v. Barrett

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 22, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Assumpsit, for money had and received. Jury trial waived.

1Opinion of the Court

Matteson, 0. J.

This is assumpsit for money had and received. The plaintiff is a beneficial association, unincorporated. The-agreed statement of facts shows that while a member of the association the defendant received of the funds belonging to it $13.86, which he still retains, though he had ceased to be a member of the association before the bringing of the suit. The court below held that the action could not be maintained because the association, not being incorporated, must be regarded as a partnership.

We think this was error. The essential element of a partnership, as between its members,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lafond v. . DeemsNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Burke v. RoperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  3. Brown v. StoerkelMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Burt v. LathropMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Gridley v. . DoleNew York Court of Appeals · 1851

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DeMille v. American Federation of Radio ArtistsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Gregory Oskoian, Etc. v. Theobald J. Canuel, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
  3. Newark v. Theatrical Mgrs. U.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API