Legal Opinion

Pearl v. Township of Benton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1902No. Docket No. 103PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Berrien; Coolidge, J. Case by Arthur L. Pearl against the township of Benton for personal injuries. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

The plaintiff was injured through the fall of a bent under the end of a bridge. This bridge was built by the township over a drain many years ago, and in the fall of 1892 it was rebuilt. The north posts rested upon the old mudsill, which was sound, and was not disturbed. The men who rebuilt it stated that the bed of the mudsill was below the bottom of the drain. The negligence complained of is that, in rebuilding the bridge, the contractor left the mudsill some inches above the bottom of the drain, and that it was afterwards undermined by ■water; and plaintiff claims that the bridge was never…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stoddard v. Inhabitants of WinchesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Wakeham v. Township of St. ClairMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Rochefort v. Inhabitants of AttleboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pearl v. Township of BentonMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API