Legal Opinion

United States of America, Appellant-Cross v. Gladys Towles Root and George A. Forde, Appellees-Cross

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 25, 1966No. 20360PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, District Judge:

A trial, sometimes referred to as a “search for the truth”, was held in Unit ed States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division, resulting in conviction of Joseph Clyde Amsler and John William Irwin for violation of several laws of the United States, one of which was 18 U.S.C. § 1201, which section forbids the interstate transportation of a kidnap victim. This trial started on February 10 and terminated on March 7 of 1964.

The appellees, Root and Forde, were attorneys for Irwin and Amsler and represented them at the trial.

The defendants,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States v. PerlsteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. Butler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Enrico Campanale and Donald Matthews, United States of America v. Mike GrancichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Jeremiah P. Buckley, Ellsworth B. Sargent, Washington Water Power Co., and Sargent-Tyee Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. David S. King, United States of America v. Stanley E. Deal, M. D.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. William Rose and Robert PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API