Legal Opinion

Puryear v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 4, 1937No. 8 Div. 753PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

Bill to quiet title to land and this appeal involves only the sufficiency of the description of the land as set out in the bill of complaint.

We are in accord with the contention of appellant’s counsel that greater particularity is required in the description of land in complaints and judgments and decrees than in deeds and that judgments and decrees should he so certain as to enable an officer in executing the judgment or decree to do so without the exercise of a discretion. Hughes v. Allen, 229 Ala. 467, 158 So. 307. But this rule does not exclude resort by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hurt v. FreemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Hughes v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Orso v. CaterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. Norrie v. FlemingIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Brown v. SohnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  4. Golden Condor, Inc. v. BellIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Golden Condor, Inc. v. BellIdaho Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API