Legal Opinion

Sterling Bank of Sleeper & Chamberlain v. Scott

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1925No. Docket No. 52PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Plaintiff owns four drain orders drawn on the fund of the Craner Creek drain, a three county drain, which were issued to one Lucas for bridge construction work done by him during the construction of the drain. The orders were presented for pay ment when there was enough money in the fund to pay them and payment was refused on the advice of the prosecuting attorney. Plaintiffs sought to compel payment by mandamus. A township and several interested parties were permitted to intervene, and upon their application and that of defendants the case was transferred to the chancery side of the court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shattuck v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Auditor General v. BoltMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Township of Clarence v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Crandall v. McElhenyMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Sandusky Grain Co. v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lamberton v. PawloskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Anderson v. Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Lamberton v. PawloskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API