Legal Opinion · Dissent

PSINet, Inc. v. Chapman

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 24, 2004No. 01-2352Published

1DissentNiemeyer, Circuit Judge

By a vote of 4-1, judges of this court voted to rehear this case en banc. Because 8 judges disqualified themselves from voting, however, the case will not be reheard. See Fourth Circuit Local Rule 35(b) (requiring for en banc review the vote of a majority of circuit judges who are in regular, active service). This procedural bar is particularly unfortunate as it applies to this seminal First Amendment case because the law of the Fourth Circuit is now written solely by two district judges who were designated to sit on the three-judge panel, and not by any circuit judge.

The panel majority…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Ginsberg v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. PSINet, Inc. v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API