Legal Opinion

Shaine & Son v. Block

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 7, 1922No. 13100PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Greensboro — W. H. Fisher, judge pro hae vice. October 20, 1921.

1Opinion of the Court

Broyles, 0. J.

1. Where no proper brief of evidence is sent up, this court cannot decide any question which is dependent upon a consideration of the evidence. “ If all the assignments of error are of that class, a judgment of affirmance will result. If there are assignments of error, such as rulings on demurrers, or the like, which do not involve a consideration of the evidence, they may be passed on.” Crumbley v. Brook, 135 Ga. 723 (70 S. E. 655).

2. What purports to be a brief of the evidence in the instant case is evidently a copy of the stenographic report of the proceedings therein, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crumbley v. BrookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boston Insurance Co. v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. First National Bank v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. McKenzie Trust Co. v. BullardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  4. Norris v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API