Legal Opinion

Norris v. Gray

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 7, 1923No. 14733, 14799Published

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

‘/When a document purporting, to Ipe.a brief of evidence is extensively .interspersed, with, statements and arguments of- counsel and rulings of the court on .evidence . . , the paper will not be treated by this court as a brief of evidence, and no question made in the record which is dependent upon the evidence will be decided.!’ Graham v. City of Baxley, 117 Ga. 42 (2) (43 S. E. 405); Equitable Mortgage Co. v. Bell, 115 Ga. 651 (1) (42 S. E. 82); McComb v. Hines, 123 Ga. 246 (51 S. E. 300); Wall v. Mercer, 119 Ga. 346 (46 S. E. 420); Scott v. Davis, 22 Ga. App., 32 (3)(95 S. E. 332); Shaine…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wall v. MercerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Equitable Mortgage Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. McComb v. HinesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Avery & Co. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  5. Graham v. City of BaxleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API