Legal Opinion

Cleveland v. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 30, 2022No. 3:19-cv-02141Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DON CLEVELAND, et al., Case No.: 19-cv-02141-JM-JLB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS/COUNTER- 14 LUDWIG INSTITUTE FOR CANCER DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO RESEARCH LTD, et al., 15 COMPEL Defendants. 16 (ECF Nos. 164 (sealed), 166) 17 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM. 18 19 20 Before the Court is a Motion to Compel filed by Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants 21 Don Cleveland, Arshad Desai, Frank Furnari, Richard Kolodner, Paul Mischel, 22 Karen Oegema and Bing Ren (collectively,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
  2. Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Wilson & Wilson v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Gilbert v. SykesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Jolley v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API