Legal Opinion
State v. Blair
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 7, 1927PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMauck, J.
An indictment was returned by the grand jury of Pike county against Guy Blair, who filed a demurrer thereto. The demurrer was sustained and the accused discharged. From this judgment the prosecuting attorney in the name of the state prosecutes error, seeking by petition in error in this court to have the judgment entered on the demurrer reversed and the state “restored to all things it has lost by reason thereof.”
Whether the state has authority to file the petition in error and this court power to review the judgment complained of is a question apparently not settled, nor heretofore…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kepner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- State v. BouknightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
- A. F. Waite Taxi & Livery Co. v. McGrewOhio Court of Appeals · 1922
- Koppe v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1926
- Psaris v. FredericksOhio Supreme Court · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. GosslerOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
- Acker v. Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1944
- McKinnon v. PettiboneOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
- City of Cincinnati v. CoyOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
- City of Zanesville v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.