Legal Opinion
Bell v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 31, 1967PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge Fuld.
This is an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division confirming the determination of the Waterfront Commission revoking the petitioner’s registration as a longshoreman. The petitioner, 33 years old, had been a longshoreman since 1952, when he was 19. In 1960, desirous of improving his employment status, he applied to the respondent Commission for registration as a checker.1 Starting in October, 1961, he was called before one of the Commission’s lawyers for a series of interviews relating to his application. Although notified that he had the right to be represented by…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Abington School Dist. v. SchemppSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- MATTER OF BELL v. Waterfront Comm.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Nysa-Ila Vacation and Holiday Fund and Nysa-Ila Gai Fund v. The Waterfront Commission of New York HarborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Freda v. LavineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Freda v. LavineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Local 1814 v. Waterfront CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.