Legal Opinion
United States v. Vazquez
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 14, 1998No. 3:95CV1216(AHN)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING PERMANENT PROTECTIVE ORDER
NEVAS, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, the United States of America and the State of Connecticut as parens patriae, brought this action against the defendant, Carmen E.F. Vazquez (“Vazquez”), for allegedly violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, 18 U.S.C. § 248 (“FACE”). After a nine-day bench trial, the court found that Vazquez’s behavior did not violate FACE.
Vazquez subsequently appealed, in pertinent part, from the court’s order sealing a portion of the record and preventing the dissemination of certain videotapes. The Court of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Chen-Oster v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- United States v. AckertDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1999