Legal Opinion
United States v. Ackert
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 2, 1999No. Misc. A. 3:97 MC 83(WIG)Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARFINKEL, United States Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner, the United States of America, has moved to release a sealed transcript of an in camera interview of Mr. David A. Ackert conducted by this Court. It has also moved to further enforce an IRS summons which is the subject of this action. For the following reasons, petitioner’s motion [Doc. #40] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
BACKGROUND
Familiarity with the underlying facts is presumed. We set forth only those facts relevant to the resolution of the issue before us.
On August 15, 1997, this Court interviewed Ackert in camera for the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.