Legal Opinion

Freiberg v. Cody

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1884PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Osceola. (Judkins, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

■ The plaintiffs in this case were merchant tailors and lived in Reed City. The defendants were engaged in lumbering business and lived in Missaukee county, and had their lumber camp about twenty miles northeast of Cadillac. Reed City is about twenty-seven miles south of Cadillac, on the Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad. On the first day of November, the defendant Moore, being at the lumber camp, gave to the plaintiff Rothweiler the defendant’s check on Rice & Messmore’s Bank at Cadillac for $66, about 1 o’clock in the afternoon. Rothweiler immediately thereafter Avent to the Cadillac bank,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Phœnix Insurance v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Nutting v. BurkedMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. KempMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Plover Savings Bank v. MoodieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Culver v. Judge of the Superior CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Johannsen v. EvansAppellate Court of Illinois · 1933
  5. Haggerty v. BaldwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API