Phœnix Insurance v. Allen
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne Circuit. Tbe case is sufficiently stated in tbe opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Christiancy J.:
This was an action of assumpsit brought by Allen, the plaintiff below, against the company, to recover the amount of a loss by fire under a policy issued by the company to Allen.
The declaration contained counts upon the policy, and the common counts. The plea was the general issue. It appeared from the evidence introduced by the plaintiff (and of these facts there was no dispute), that on the 20th day of April, 1861, the loss under the policy had been adjusted by compromise between Allen and the company (the latter acting through one Holden, their agent, *507having power to adjust…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jennison v. ParkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by22 opinions
- Otto v. Halff & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
- State ex rel. First National Bank v. BartleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Ricketts v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
- Ray v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
- Hatch v. First National BankSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1900
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.