Legal Opinion

In Re Wachovia Shareholders Litigation

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 18, 2005No. COA04-402PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCullough, Judge.

Arising from a complex business merger between Wachovia Corporation (“Wachovia”) and First Union Corporation (“First Union”), this appeal raises a single question of law for our consideration. Did the special business court (“business court”) have legal authority to award attorney’s fees to shareholders of Wachovia Corporation (“plaintiffs”) for their lawsuit brought against Wachovia, where the successful product of the lawsuit provided some alleged corporate benefit to fellow shareholders? Our following recitation of the facts is narrowed in scope to address this single…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United Vanguard Fund, Inc. v. TakeCare, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  4. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Energy Investors Fund, L.P. v. Metric Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ehrenhaus v. BakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. Ehrenhaus v. BakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  3. In Re Harris Teeter Merger Litig.North Carolina Business Court · 2014
  4. Corwin v. British Am. Tobacco P.L.C.North Carolina Business Court · 2016
  5. Ehrenhaus v. BakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API