Legal Opinion

George Halcott Norman, III v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided November 4, 2003No. 1237023PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Humphreys, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which Bumgardner, J., joined.

1Opinion of the Court

*631JEAN HARRISON CLEMENTS, Judge.

George Halcott Norman, III, was convicted in a bench trial of driving as an habitual offender, second or subsequent offense, in violation of Code § 46.2-357.1 On appeal, he contends the trial court erred in determining he was an habitual offender because his driving privilege had been fully restored prior to his arrest on the charge. On May 6, 2003, a divided panel of this Court affirmed Norman’s conviction, holding that the evidence was sufficient to establish Norman’s status as an habitual offender because it demonstrated his driving privilege had only been…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sutphin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1985
  2. Bright v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  3. Branch v. BranchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  4. Rose v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  5. Steinberg v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Com. v. NormanSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API