Legal Opinion

Somma v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 11, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered February 5, 1975, granting defendant’s motion to modify plaintiffs demand for a bill of particulars and denying plaintiffs cross motion to strike or modify defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of striking plaintiffs demand in its entirety, striking items numbered 2 and 20 of defendant’s demand, and deleting the word "exact” from items numbered 1 and 3 of defendant’s demand, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Movielab, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  2. L. F. Dommerich & Co. v. Diener & Dorskind, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  3. Vicidomini v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nazario v. FromchuckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Di Lorenzo v. EllisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Metropolitan Radiological Imaging, P.C. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2005
  4. Holland v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API