Eaton v. Bd. of County Commrs.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Mahoney, J.. The. .petitioners, appellees -herein, are all of . the seven owners, of over 115. acres, of land in Bath Township, contiguous to-the village, of Fairlawn, to which they seek annexation. Theirpetition was denied-by the-Board, of ¡.County Commissioners, of Summit - County.. The. Court of Common,Pleas of Summit County, found that .the denial was “* .*■ % arbitrary and unreasonable, and-is not supported by; the preponderance of reliable and, probative, evidence !*■ *■ The court: reversed: the: decision of :the Board and ordered annexation. • ,.. >r:: ■ ; -
From that judgment, the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lariccia v. Mahoning County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1974
3Cited by3 opinions
- Miami Township Board of Trustees v. CatonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Township of Jefferson v. City of West CarrolltonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981
- In Re Annexation of Territory in Olmsted TownshipOhio Court of Appeals · 1984