Legal Opinion

Ambrosini v. Astrue

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 23, 2010No. Civil Action 10-89PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ARTHUR J. SCHWAB, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff Timothy E. Ambrosini (hereinafter “Ambrosini”) brings this action pur suant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), seeking review of the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (hereinafter “Commissioner”) denying his application for supplemental security income (hereinafter “SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (herein after the “Act”). 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1383f. Consistent with the customary practice in the Western District of Pennsylvania, the parties have filed cross-motions for…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. Ethel Burnett v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Doucette v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
  3. Roberts v. SaulDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Robinson v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2021
  5. Sou v. SaulDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API