Ambrosini v. Astrue
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ARTHUR J. SCHWAB, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff Timothy E. Ambrosini (hereinafter “Ambrosini”) brings this action pur suant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), seeking review of the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (hereinafter “Commissioner”) denying his application for supplemental security income (hereinafter “SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (herein after the “Act”). 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1383f. Consistent with the customary practice in the Western District of Pennsylvania, the parties have filed cross-motions for…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Ethel Burnett v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Davis v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Doucette v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Roberts v. SaulDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Robinson v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2021
- Sou v. SaulDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020