Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Shively

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1881PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Clatsop. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Lord, C. J.:

This was an action brought by the respondent to recover of appellant, upon his warranty of title to certain lots in Shively’s addition to the city of Astoria, the sum of two hundred and sixty-seven dollars and sixty-five cents, the amount alleged to have been paid by respondent to buy in an alleged superior outstanding title in B. C. Shively. The verdict of the jury was in favor of the respondent for the sum of one hundred and sixty-seven dollars and sixty-five cents, and judgment was rendered for that amount, and costs and disbursements.

The bill of exceptions…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Symmes v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. State v. DelongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
  3. Carpentier v. ThirstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Morse v. WeymouthSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baker County v. HuntingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Christenson v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Graf v. PearcyOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Marr v. PutnamOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Marr v. PutnamOregon Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API