Legal Opinion

Marr v. Putnam

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1952Published

1Opinion of the Court

196 Or. 1 (1952)

246 P.2d 509

MARR ET AL.

v.

PUTNAM ET AL.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued January 10, 1952.

Reargued April 22, 1952.

Reversed and remanded June 25, 1952.

Petition for rehearing denied September 9, 1952.

Norman K. Winslow, of Salem, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was W.C. Winslow, of Salem.

Wallace P. Carson and Ralph E. Moody, of Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With them on the brief were Moody & Lamkin, Allan G. Carson, and Douglas L. Hay, of Salem.

Before BRAND, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, LUSK, LATOURETTE and WARNER, Justices.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

LUSK…

Also in this document: Dissent · Rossman; Dissent · Latourette.

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Burt v. Advertiser Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Byam v. . CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Washington Times Co. v. BonnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  4. Detroit Daily Post Co. v. McArthurMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Fleischmann v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API