Legal Opinion
Holbrook & Co. v. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 6, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Certiorari. Before Judge Lumpkin. Fulton superior court. March term, 1900.
1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.
This case, upon its facts, is identical with that
of Holbrook & Co. v. Railroad Co., supra, save that the return of service in the present case was in the following words: “ Served the within by serving summons of garnishment issued on within .affidavit and bond on Evansville and Terre Haute R. R., by serving X). H. Hillsman, Gen. Sou. Agt., S. L. Rogers, Trav. Frt. Agt., and R. L. Sams, Commercial Agt., each personally at 3 P. M., they being in charge of office. This March 2, 1899. [Signed] R. B. Lynch, L. C.” The judge of the superior court, following the derision rendered in Southern…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Third National Bank v. McCullough Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Southern Railway Co. v. HaganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Hargis v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Phillips v. BullardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
3Cited by5 opinions
- McCown v. MuldrowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
- Render & Hammett v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Stuart Lumber Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Fitzgerald v. Langley Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
- Mosely v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925