Legal Opinion

Cummins v. Bulgin

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On final hearing on bill and answer and proofs taken in open court.

1Opinion of the Court

Van Eleet, Y. C.

This suit is brought to reform a mining léase. Reformation is asked on the ground of mistake. The power of a court of equity to reform deeds and other writings for the correction of mistakes stands among its most ancient and useful powers. To warrant its exercise, however, the proof in demonstration of mistake must be clear and satisfactory, such as produces a strong conviction of its truth. That which is written will not be changed on loose, doubtful or equivocal evidence. A mistake, in a legal sense, may be defined to be the doing of an act under an erroneous conviction,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Conduit Found. Corp. v. City of Atlantic CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  2. Smith v. Motor Club of America Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  3. Santamaria v. Shell Eastern Petro.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  4. Panco v. RogersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. Toth v. VazquezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API