Legal Opinion

Santamaria v. Shell Eastern Petro.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 4, 1934PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complainant says that on September 20th, 1929, after several weeks of negotiating, the defendant contracted in writing to deliver gasoline and other products to him at a fixed price, for a period of one year. When the terms of the contract were being discussed, complainant asked the representatives of the defendant company to give him the exclusive right to sell its products in the city of Newark, in a zone described as follows: "A zone of one and one-third miles on three sides of the said station, and because of the fact that northerly of the said station exists the Passaic river, and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shenandoah Valley R. R. v. DunlopSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889
  2. Riehl v. RiehlNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  3. Administrators of Ligon v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  4. Swedesboro Loan & Building Ass'n v. GansNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1903
  5. Forman v. Grant Lunch Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Conduit Found. Corp. v. City of Atlantic CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  2. Smith v. Motor Club of America Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  3. Volker v. the Conn. Fire Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  4. Moro v. PuloneNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  5. Panco v. RogersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API