Legal Opinion
Fernandez-Roque v. Smith
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided November 25, 1985No. Civ. A. C81-1084A, C81-938APublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SHOOB, District Judge.
In Fernandez-Roque v. Smith, 734 F.2d 576, 582 (11th Cir.1984), the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals rejected plaintiffs’ claim to a constitutionally-protected liberty interest in parole arising from the due process clause of the United States Constitution (i.e., a “core” liberty interest). In that case, however, the court expressly reserved decision on two other issues raised by plaintiffs in challenging their detention: (1) whether the class members have a federally-created liberty interest in parole, not arising directly from the Constitution itself; and (2)…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Garcia-Mir v. MeeseCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Martinez v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Garcia-Mir v. MeeseCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Mehinovic v. VuckovicDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2002
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2953, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4047 Jose Gonzalez Martinez Maria Pinto De Gonzalez v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal Corporation Los Angeles Police Department Willie Williams, Chief, Los Angeles Police Department Detective Gilbert Moya, Salvador Nares, John White, Alberto F. Gonzales, in Their Official and Individual CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.