Legal Opinion
Garcia-Mir v. Meese
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 23, 1986No. Nos. 86-8010, 86-8011PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Circuit Judge:
These cases pose the question whether unadmitted aliens properly may claim the protection of the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution to secure parole revocation hearings. We earlier determined that, for unadmitted aliens, the right to such hearings is not resident in the core values of the Due Process Clause per se. We are today asked to determine whether some actionable liberty interest exists, not based on a core value, which is nonetheless protected by the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of due process of law. For the reasons explained herein, we find it…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Mejia Rodriguez v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Tefel v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Alexis Barrera-Echavarria v. Richard H. Rison, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.