Legal Opinion

Booth v. Clark

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

On December 10, 1924, the plaintiff, on his own behalf and on account of a large number of taxpayers similarly situated, filed a petition in the district court for a writ of mandate, praying that defendant in her official capacity as treasurer and ex-officio tax collector be required to accept state, county, city and school taxes theretofore duly levied against certain real estate owned by him and falling due in the year 1924, exclusive of the drainage, assessment falling due in the same year.

From the petition, inter alia, it appears that the plaintiff and numerous taxpayers owned real…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Raleigh v. PeaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  2. Interstate Trust Co. v. Montezuma Valley Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  3. Elliott v. McCreaIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Hackney v. ElliottNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Howell v. LambersomSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chambers v. McCollumIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Heffner v. KetchenIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Tondre v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Breckenridge v. JohnstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  5. State v. ColeWyoming Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API