Legal Opinion

Michael Alan Dean Hill v. El Dorado County, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 4, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00751Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MICHAEL ALAN DEAN HILL, No. 2:25-cv-00751 SCR P 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER 13 EL DORADO COUNTY, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is a pretrial criminal detainee proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) is before the undersigned for 18 screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.1 For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned finds that 19 plaintiff’s FAC states a cognizable First and Fourteenth Amendment denial of access to the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API