Legal Opinion

Colt Int'l Clothing Inc. v. Quasar Sci., LLC

District Court, C.D. California

Decided April 3, 2018No. Case No. 2:17–cv–0732S–AB (JEMx)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HONORABLE ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

On March 9, 2018, Defendant Dadco, LLC ("Dadco") filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint ("FAC," Dkt. No. 23). Dkt. No. 29. Plaintiff Colt International Clothing Inc. ("Plaintiff") filed an opposition and Dadco filed a reply. Dkt. Nos. 32, 34. The Court deems this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument and vacates the hearing scheduled for April 6, 2018. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78 ; LR 7-15. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES the Motion.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Plaintiff's Complaint

The FAC alleges…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Scott Nordstrom v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Woodland Trust v. Flowertree Nursery, Inc. And Ivy J. WinslettCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. LCW INVESTMENTS LLC v. CLIFFORDDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2024
  2. simplehuman, LLC v. iTouchless Housewares and Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API