Walker v. Gomez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
This memorandum disposition supplements the opinion filed concurrently herewith.
1. The district court did not err in dismissing Walker’s claims against defendant Gomez under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as “[liability under section 1983 arises only upon a showing of personal participation by the defendant.” Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir.1989).
2. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Walker’s request for additional time to amend the complaint. Pro se civil litigants are not excepted from court-ordered deadlines. See Jones v. Phipps, 39 F.3d 158, 163 (7th…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kim King and Kent Norman v. Victor AtiyehCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- (PC) Rogers v. WardenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Wilson v. MacomberDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025