A. J. Straus Paying Agency, Inc. v. Jensen
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
The question presented on this appeal is, to say the least,' unusual if not novel. The plaintiffs, as trustees under the trust deed, although represented at the foreclosure sale by counsel who bid competitively for the properties, would like to have another opportunity to bid at the *466foreclosure sale because they now believe that if they owned the properties they could probably sell them for prices that might net the bondholders more than will result from the sale of the premises to Melissa Clovis for $40,100, subject to outstanding taxes. The sale was duly noticed, advertised, and fairly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Suring State Bank v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Kremer v. ThwaitsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Griswold v. BardenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Johnson v. GoultWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- John Paul Lumber Co. v. NeumeisterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Moeller v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Gumz v. ChickeringWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Bihlmire v. HahnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Anthony Grignano Co. v. GoochWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- Gratiot State Bank v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.